<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dimensions of differentiation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.semanticargument.com/2009/10/01/dimensions-of-differentiation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.semanticargument.com/2009/10/01/dimensions-of-differentiation/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 15:55:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth</title>
		<link>http://www.semanticargument.com/2009/10/01/dimensions-of-differentiation/comment-page-1/#comment-1238</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Dec 2010 16:44:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.semanticargument.com/?p=612#comment-1238</guid>
		<description>I can just say thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can just say thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: differentiating brands &#171; eskimon</title>
		<link>http://www.semanticargument.com/2009/10/01/dimensions-of-differentiation/comment-page-1/#comment-145</link>
		<dc:creator>differentiating brands &#171; eskimon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 10:34:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.semanticargument.com/?p=612#comment-145</guid>
		<description>[...] has a great introduction to differentiation techniques on his semantic argument blog, so I thought I&#8217;d jshare some additional thoughts on aspects of the marketing mix you might [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] has a great introduction to differentiation techniques on his semantic argument blog, so I thought I&#8217;d jshare some additional thoughts on aspects of the marketing mix you might [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://www.semanticargument.com/2009/10/01/dimensions-of-differentiation/comment-page-1/#comment-144</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 23:42:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.semanticargument.com/?p=612#comment-144</guid>
		<description>Muhammad,

Great point. I agree that following a systematic approach can be limiting and obscure opportunities to do something new. But I do like the idea of having a &#039;toolbox&#039; to turn to that helps ensure you haven&#039;t overlooked directions that other brands have already used successfully.

What I&#039;m really hoping to do is simply organize these anecdotes of success-through-differentiation so that we can at least think about them categorically as opposed to individually. If, for example, JetBlue and Charles Schwab have used a similar technique---uniquely friendly brand personalities---to stand out in their respective industries, I think seeing that connection between the two situations is the best way to learn from it and potentially do something similar in a different industry. (Whether or not they&#039;re using the similar techniques is debatable, of course, and whether or not doing something similar elsewhere makes sense depends on context, as you&#039;ve suggested.)

I&#039;m never a fan of statements like &quot;there are X ways to differentiate your brand.&quot; The second we limit ourselves that way is the second we give up on real creativity (it also devalues us as brand consultants). But I wouldn&#039;t mind being able to say &quot;if you&#039;re at an impasse and looking for a way to differentiate from competitors, here are X ideas to consider.&quot; I&#039;m trying to build a taxonomy of ideas to use as thought starters, I suppose.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Muhammad,</p>
<p>Great point. I agree that following a systematic approach can be limiting and obscure opportunities to do something new. But I do like the idea of having a &#8216;toolbox&#8217; to turn to that helps ensure you haven&#8217;t overlooked directions that other brands have already used successfully.</p>
<p>What I&#8217;m really hoping to do is simply organize these anecdotes of success-through-differentiation so that we can at least think about them categorically as opposed to individually. If, for example, JetBlue and Charles Schwab have used a similar technique&#8212;uniquely friendly brand personalities&#8212;to stand out in their respective industries, I think seeing that connection between the two situations is the best way to learn from it and potentially do something similar in a different industry. (Whether or not they&#8217;re using the similar techniques is debatable, of course, and whether or not doing something similar elsewhere makes sense depends on context, as you&#8217;ve suggested.)</p>
<p>I&#8217;m never a fan of statements like &#8220;there are X ways to differentiate your brand.&#8221; The second we limit ourselves that way is the second we give up on real creativity (it also devalues us as brand consultants). But I wouldn&#8217;t mind being able to say &#8220;if you&#8217;re at an impasse and looking for a way to differentiate from competitors, here are X ideas to consider.&#8221; I&#8217;m trying to build a taxonomy of ideas to use as thought starters, I suppose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

