<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Another day, another flavor for Gatorade</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.semanticargument.com/2009/06/02/another-day-another-flavor-for-gatorade/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.semanticargument.com/2009/06/02/another-day-another-flavor-for-gatorade/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 15:55:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chad</title>
		<link>http://www.semanticargument.com/2009/06/02/another-day-another-flavor-for-gatorade/comment-page-1/#comment-90</link>
		<dc:creator>Chad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 05:47:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.semanticargument.com/?p=348#comment-90</guid>
		<description>I like that you bring up that old print ad, Rob.  That&#039;s back when Gatorade actually used to be about the purpose and function of its product.  Somewhere along the line it lost that focus and became more image-conscious and hip.  And I swear today&#039;s Gatorade is sweeter than it was 20 years ago.  As a runner I don&#039;t trust it as much anymore.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like that you bring up that old print ad, Rob.  That&#8217;s back when Gatorade actually used to be about the purpose and function of its product.  Somewhere along the line it lost that focus and became more image-conscious and hip.  And I swear today&#8217;s Gatorade is sweeter than it was 20 years ago.  As a runner I don&#8217;t trust it as much anymore.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Meyerson</title>
		<link>http://www.semanticargument.com/2009/06/02/another-day-another-flavor-for-gatorade/comment-page-1/#comment-88</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Meyerson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 01:01:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.semanticargument.com/?p=348#comment-88</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Paul. Gotta ask, what did you end up buying, Vitamin Water?

This also made me think of an old Gatorade print ad that I love, which simply showed a hat with sweat stains on it with copy reading &quot;When you sweat, you lose more than just water.&quot; Straight to the point. And very different from all of the TV ads we&#039;re talking about here, although I&#039;ll grant that it was awhile ago. I can&#039;t find a copy of it anywhere online...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Paul. Gotta ask, what did you end up buying, Vitamin Water?</p>
<p>This also made me think of an old Gatorade print ad that I love, which simply showed a hat with sweat stains on it with copy reading &#8220;When you sweat, you lose more than just water.&#8221; Straight to the point. And very different from all of the TV ads we&#8217;re talking about here, although I&#8217;ll grant that it was awhile ago. I can&#8217;t find a copy of it anywhere online&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul van Winkle</title>
		<link>http://www.semanticargument.com/2009/06/02/another-day-another-flavor-for-gatorade/comment-page-1/#comment-87</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul van Winkle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 20:28:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.semanticargument.com/?p=348#comment-87</guid>
		<description>Dude, you&#039;re so right on.  &#039;G&#039; stands for Great Moments in Brand Dipshittery.  (GMBD)

Gatorade&#039;s indeed flailing.  As an athlete and a tri-athlete, I&#039;ve bought it for decades.  The other day in a convenience store, I was stymied trying to understand where the hell it went -- literally (the new packaging didn&#039;t connect with my eyeballs, at all) -- and metaphorically (the brand reliably SIGNIFIED improved performance and recovery while sweating).  They got lost in their data and they lost me.  

Good time for smart competitors, all this push for &quot;brand disrution&quot;!  &quot;Change for the sake of change&quot;!  
As a customer, and loyal brand user, I was suddenly laid open and looking for something else....

Research showed their brand was losing major share to many new competitors, and Pepsi/Gatorade even sued Coke/PowerAde recently at the peak of their various custard flingings.  OK, is that lawsuit working for or against the plaintiff&#039;s brand and sales -- long term?  How about short-term?  Can we language the suit complaint in such a way to support our brand?  A cross-current question marketing was  prevented from chiming in on.  Too bad -- it hurt&#039;em.

Nike is still a great partner for the G.  If they were smart and not merely reactionary, they&#039;d re-build those legacy bridges -- and just add new ones, consistently.

Thanks for posting, consistently good, Rob.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dude, you&#8217;re so right on.  &#8216;G&#8217; stands for Great Moments in Brand Dipshittery.  (GMBD)</p>
<p>Gatorade&#8217;s indeed flailing.  As an athlete and a tri-athlete, I&#8217;ve bought it for decades.  The other day in a convenience store, I was stymied trying to understand where the hell it went &#8212; literally (the new packaging didn&#8217;t connect with my eyeballs, at all) &#8212; and metaphorically (the brand reliably SIGNIFIED improved performance and recovery while sweating).  They got lost in their data and they lost me.  </p>
<p>Good time for smart competitors, all this push for &#8220;brand disrution&#8221;!  &#8220;Change for the sake of change&#8221;!<br />
As a customer, and loyal brand user, I was suddenly laid open and looking for something else&#8230;.</p>
<p>Research showed their brand was losing major share to many new competitors, and Pepsi/Gatorade even sued Coke/PowerAde recently at the peak of their various custard flingings.  OK, is that lawsuit working for or against the plaintiff&#8217;s brand and sales &#8212; long term?  How about short-term?  Can we language the suit complaint in such a way to support our brand?  A cross-current question marketing was  prevented from chiming in on.  Too bad &#8212; it hurt&#8217;em.</p>
<p>Nike is still a great partner for the G.  If they were smart and not merely reactionary, they&#8217;d re-build those legacy bridges &#8212; and just add new ones, consistently.</p>
<p>Thanks for posting, consistently good, Rob.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

