<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More unnecessary quotation marks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.semanticargument.com/2009/05/14/more-unnecessary-quotation-marks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.semanticargument.com/2009/05/14/more-unnecessary-quotation-marks/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 15:55:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: simplicity works</title>
		<link>http://www.semanticargument.com/2009/05/14/more-unnecessary-quotation-marks/comment-page-1/#comment-202</link>
		<dc:creator>simplicity works</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 17:41:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.semanticargument.com/?p=316#comment-202</guid>
		<description>[...] (will not be published) ... staff. Uncategorized. works in progress. archives. February 2010 ...More unnecessary quotation marks - Semantic ArgumentI posted about this nerdy pet peeve of mine awhile back. Here it is rearing its ugly head again, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] (will not be published) &#8230; staff. Uncategorized. works in progress. archives. February 2010 &#8230;More unnecessary quotation marks &#8211; Semantic ArgumentI posted about this nerdy pet peeve of mine awhile back. Here it is rearing its ugly head again, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul van Winkle</title>
		<link>http://www.semanticargument.com/2009/05/14/more-unnecessary-quotation-marks/comment-page-1/#comment-74</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul van Winkle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 18:27:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.semanticargument.com/?p=316#comment-74</guid>
		<description>Love the simplicity-difficulty topic.  Hate the punctuation and free-range caps madness.

&quot;Simplicity&quot; gets a little confused and mashed up, methinks, because:  it depends on what you&#039;re talking about, the information landscape(s), the mission(s) at hand, and the desired result(s).

Copy?  Simple = good.
Information?  Simple / clear  = good (though not too simple)
Maps for achieving results?  Clear = good (because simple may not be possible or good).  

These guys do a good job with process and organizational visual mapping:  www.xplane.com

And who deosn&#039;t love:  www.edwardtufte.com   
Excellent topic he covers:  data density</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Love the simplicity-difficulty topic.  Hate the punctuation and free-range caps madness.</p>
<p>&#8220;Simplicity&#8221; gets a little confused and mashed up, methinks, because:  it depends on what you&#8217;re talking about, the information landscape(s), the mission(s) at hand, and the desired result(s).</p>
<p>Copy?  Simple = good.<br />
Information?  Simple / clear  = good (though not too simple)<br />
Maps for achieving results?  Clear = good (because simple may not be possible or good).  </p>
<p>These guys do a good job with process and organizational visual mapping:  <a href="http://www.xplane.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.xplane.com</a></p>
<p>And who deosn&#8217;t love:  <a href="http://www.edwardtufte.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.edwardtufte.com</a><br />
Excellent topic he covers:  data density</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

