<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: All branding and no business</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.semanticargument.com/2009/04/16/all-branding-and-no-business/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.semanticargument.com/2009/04/16/all-branding-and-no-business/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 15:55:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://www.semanticargument.com/2009/04/16/all-branding-and-no-business/comment-page-1/#comment-289</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 08:31:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.semanticargument.com/?p=258#comment-289</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/26/business/media/26adco.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;More insight&lt;/a&gt; into whether or not Kodak&#039;s brand can stand for more than film photography. To the naysayers, apparently the company has been having some success with digital as of late. Why? Because, as suggested here and in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.semanticargument.com/2009/04/24/the-myth-and-misuse-of-one-thing/comment-page-1/#comment-288&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;my follow up post&lt;/a&gt;, they can finally credibly claim they &quot;do more than film.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/26/business/media/26adco.html" rel="nofollow">More insight</a> into whether or not Kodak&#8217;s brand can stand for more than film photography. To the naysayers, apparently the company has been having some success with digital as of late. Why? Because, as suggested here and in <a href="http://www.semanticargument.com/2009/04/24/the-myth-and-misuse-of-one-thing/comment-page-1/#comment-288" rel="nofollow">my follow up post</a>, they can finally credibly claim they &#8220;do more than film.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://www.semanticargument.com/2009/04/16/all-branding-and-no-business/comment-page-1/#comment-104</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 05:02:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.semanticargument.com/?p=258#comment-104</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the comment, Matt. I like your tagline ideas better than what UPS is using.

Funny that you mention Staples, though. I think of them for office supplies first, copies second. Apparently their brand is strong enough to stand for both ideas. Or are they really separate ideas? That&#039;s the focus of &lt;a HREF=&quot;http://www.semanticargument.com/?p=262&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;my follow-up post&lt;/A&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comment, Matt. I like your tagline ideas better than what UPS is using.</p>
<p>Funny that you mention Staples, though. I think of them for office supplies first, copies second. Apparently their brand is strong enough to stand for both ideas. Or are they really separate ideas? That&#8217;s the focus of <a HREF="http://www.semanticargument.com/?p=262" rel="nofollow">my follow-up post</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.semanticargument.com/2009/04/16/all-branding-and-no-business/comment-page-1/#comment-103</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 19:32:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.semanticargument.com/?p=258#comment-103</guid>
		<description>Perhaps I am a little late to this post - I found it through Rob&#039;s comment while reading Laura&#039;s original post. I think you both have valid points. 

My question would be, to anyone that argues UPS&#039;s strategy was a good move: &quot;Where do you go to get copies made?&quot; 

Personally, I have never went to a UPS store only to make copies. I go to staples. I go to the UPS store to ship packages, and if I need to make some copies (for example of letters or invoices) while I&#039;m there, it&#039;s convienent that copy machines are available. If I&#039;m copying in bulk or printing a business report, I go to Staples. 

I think most people would agree. 

Considering this, perhaps a better slogan then &quot;We do more than just shipping&quot; would have been &quot;Copy, sort, staple, and ship&quot; or &quot;convenient copies, reliable shipping.&quot; Something to emphasize the convenience and the benefit copy services add.

But thats just my humble opinion, and I&#039;m a marketing guru by no means. 

-Matt
twitter: @mattmillerart</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps I am a little late to this post &#8211; I found it through Rob&#8217;s comment while reading Laura&#8217;s original post. I think you both have valid points. </p>
<p>My question would be, to anyone that argues UPS&#8217;s strategy was a good move: &#8220;Where do you go to get copies made?&#8221; </p>
<p>Personally, I have never went to a UPS store only to make copies. I go to staples. I go to the UPS store to ship packages, and if I need to make some copies (for example of letters or invoices) while I&#8217;m there, it&#8217;s convienent that copy machines are available. If I&#8217;m copying in bulk or printing a business report, I go to Staples. </p>
<p>I think most people would agree. </p>
<p>Considering this, perhaps a better slogan then &#8220;We do more than just shipping&#8221; would have been &#8220;Copy, sort, staple, and ship&#8221; or &#8220;convenient copies, reliable shipping.&#8221; Something to emphasize the convenience and the benefit copy services add.</p>
<p>But thats just my humble opinion, and I&#8217;m a marketing guru by no means. </p>
<p>-Matt<br />
twitter: @mattmillerart</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

