<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How to build a brand for free (part one)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.semanticargument.com/2009/03/11/how-to-build-a-brand-for-free-part-one/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.semanticargument.com/2009/03/11/how-to-build-a-brand-for-free-part-one/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 15:55:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Paul van Winkle</title>
		<link>http://www.semanticargument.com/2009/03/11/how-to-build-a-brand-for-free-part-one/comment-page-1/#comment-1123</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul van Winkle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2010 21:41:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.semanticargument.com/?p=122#comment-1123</guid>
		<description>Rob, I&#039;m thrilled that these new web-based automation tools have taken the messiness, drudgery and obtusity out of the branding and business-building process, for several very important reasons:

1)  Collaboration is, well, hard --- Why, just the other day, a partner at my firm emotionally exclaimed during a meeting, &quot;Our employees don&#039;t HAVE to think, they just have to LISTEN TO ME AND DO WHAT I TELL THEM!&quot;  When another partner suggested that this was rather Hitlerian, and that our people aren&#039;t dogs, he shouted back, &quot;IT&#039;S MY COMPANY AND I&#039;M HITLER, AND THEY ARE DOGS! THEY SHOULD COWER WHEN I WALK AROUND!&quot;

2) Thinking is also, well, hard --- I don&#039;t want to harp on my current firm, but another senior partner&#039;s ongoing language....uh....challenges are kept in a small notebook by his secretary, a running tally of just how....uh....challenging thinking about things is for some people.  He recently asked her what U.S. states make up &quot;New England&quot;, how to spell the word, &#039;taco&quot;, and was insulted when several female employees complained that his overuse of words ending in &quot;ck&quot; have offended them and clients alike. So I think that the idea that certain cultural, geographic and language knowledge basics central for thinking are &quot;in common&quot;, or should be at certain levels, is nice but may in fact be wrong, confusing to people, or just too dang difficult. 

3) Working is, well, to be perfectly honest, hard --- In these crazy, it&#039;s-all-about-me days with multiplying digital distractions, we all face a myriad of entertainment possibilities at the click of our interconnected fingers.  Do we really have to ask all those questions, have all those meetings, and do all those &#039;process maps&quot; or &quot;customer ethnographies&quot;?   The answer is: NO!  Which frees up more time for me and my entertainment needs, and that means there&#039;s one more happy, entertained person on the planet.  Who, then, really needs branding?

This is a program that I&#039;m certain meets the pressing needs of so many dull, entitled, and uncooperative Americans that it&#039;s sure to take off in a big way.  All I can say is &quot;Voolium Dabzoom&quot; to you! 

[ Keep up the great work.  Love and read your stuff always.  Best, Paul ]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rob, I&#8217;m thrilled that these new web-based automation tools have taken the messiness, drudgery and obtusity out of the branding and business-building process, for several very important reasons:</p>
<p>1)  Collaboration is, well, hard &#8212; Why, just the other day, a partner at my firm emotionally exclaimed during a meeting, &#8220;Our employees don&#8217;t HAVE to think, they just have to LISTEN TO ME AND DO WHAT I TELL THEM!&#8221;  When another partner suggested that this was rather Hitlerian, and that our people aren&#8217;t dogs, he shouted back, &#8220;IT&#8217;S MY COMPANY AND I&#8217;M HITLER, AND THEY ARE DOGS! THEY SHOULD COWER WHEN I WALK AROUND!&#8221;</p>
<p>2) Thinking is also, well, hard &#8212; I don&#8217;t want to harp on my current firm, but another senior partner&#8217;s ongoing language&#8230;.uh&#8230;.challenges are kept in a small notebook by his secretary, a running tally of just how&#8230;.uh&#8230;.challenging thinking about things is for some people.  He recently asked her what U.S. states make up &#8220;New England&#8221;, how to spell the word, &#8216;taco&#8221;, and was insulted when several female employees complained that his overuse of words ending in &#8220;ck&#8221; have offended them and clients alike. So I think that the idea that certain cultural, geographic and language knowledge basics central for thinking are &#8220;in common&#8221;, or should be at certain levels, is nice but may in fact be wrong, confusing to people, or just too dang difficult. </p>
<p>3) Working is, well, to be perfectly honest, hard &#8212; In these crazy, it&#8217;s-all-about-me days with multiplying digital distractions, we all face a myriad of entertainment possibilities at the click of our interconnected fingers.  Do we really have to ask all those questions, have all those meetings, and do all those &#8216;process maps&#8221; or &#8220;customer ethnographies&#8221;?   The answer is: NO!  Which frees up more time for me and my entertainment needs, and that means there&#8217;s one more happy, entertained person on the planet.  Who, then, really needs branding?</p>
<p>This is a program that I&#8217;m certain meets the pressing needs of so many dull, entitled, and uncooperative Americans that it&#8217;s sure to take off in a big way.  All I can say is &#8220;Voolium Dabzoom&#8221; to you! </p>
<p>[ Keep up the great work.  Love and read your stuff always.  Best, Paul ]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Makeup Eyes</title>
		<link>http://www.semanticargument.com/2009/03/11/how-to-build-a-brand-for-free-part-one/comment-page-1/#comment-969</link>
		<dc:creator>Makeup Eyes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Oct 2010 10:20:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.semanticargument.com/?p=122#comment-969</guid>
		<description>Hi ? very good site you have created. I enjoyed reading this posting. I did want to write a remark to tell you that the design of this site is very aesthetically pleasing. I used to be a graphic designer, now I am a copy editor. I have always enjoyed working with computers and am trying to learn code in my spare time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi ? very good site you have created. I enjoyed reading this posting. I did want to write a remark to tell you that the design of this site is very aesthetically pleasing. I used to be a graphic designer, now I am a copy editor. I have always enjoyed working with computers and am trying to learn code in my spare time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mind the Gap (logo) &#124; Semantic Argument</title>
		<link>http://www.semanticargument.com/2009/03/11/how-to-build-a-brand-for-free-part-one/comment-page-1/#comment-931</link>
		<dc:creator>Mind the Gap (logo) &#124; Semantic Argument</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Oct 2010 10:41:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.semanticargument.com/?p=122#comment-931</guid>
		<description>[...] 15 minutes. I just used the logo-design steps I outlined in one of my old, sarcastic posts titled &#8220;How to build your brand for free.&#8221; While it&#8217;s tough to objectively judge a logo, I do wonder whether the ability to quickly [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 15 minutes. I just used the logo-design steps I outlined in one of my old, sarcastic posts titled &#8220;How to build your brand for free.&#8221; While it&#8217;s tough to objectively judge a logo, I do wonder whether the ability to quickly [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

